On every programming course, you're taught never to use the goto statement even if the language has one available, as you're creating spaghetti code that's hard to follow and maintain. I agree with the sentiment.

So .... why, oh why, .... when you're navigating around directories at a command prompt do you use the cd command - it's the shell's equivalent of directory goto as it leaves you jumping away from your current directory, and not leaving a return address for when you want to go back.

Have you come across pushd and popd? When you "pushd" to a directory, you save away on a stack the name of the directory you're moving from; when you "popd" you return. Simple, effective, ang great when you want to pay a temporary visit to a remote directory in a Unix or Linux shell.

P.S. They're supported in Microsoft's Windows XP too!
(written 2004-10-05 06:54:00)

Commentator	says ...
Bruce James:	Surely in a Bash shell or another shell that supports it.. On my Solaris 9... bash: yes ksh: no bourne: no csh: yes tcsh: yes pfcsh: yes jsh: no pfsh: no zsh: yes (comment added 2004-10-05 14:06:13)
gje:	Fair comment. I'm not too familiar with jsh and pfsh ... and the bourne shell really has nothing for interaction. Ksh calls for some comment. It *is* failrly heavily used and doesn't have a native pushd / popd. If you alias 'popd=cd $OLDPWD' then you can use cd to get to a new directory and popd back again - bit rough and ready (and just one level deep) but still a jump and return structure if you need one. (comment added 2004-10-05 14:19:37)
Custard:	True, personally never come across pfsh,jsh or pfcsh before, but they appeared in 'man shells' on my Sol 9 machine. Quite a comprehensive list I thought. Shame tclsh and wish aren't there as standard, but I guess Sun are still smarting from the SunScript debacle. For a single level popd, you can also 'cd -' which takes you back to where you came from. I use that one all the time. And sometimes if I need 2 levels, I just run another shell. My fave shells are bash then ksh, and I'd say that ksh is probably the most common of the most fully featured shells, and csh the most broken and advised-against-scripting for. But bash is appearing more and more on other systems now. Of course bourne (sh) is still the lowest common denominator if you need to write a script to run across platforms.. b (sits back and waits for the flames ;-) (comment added 2004-10-06 13:54:24)

A101 - Web Application Deployment - Linux -An Introduction For Users

Back to vi - full circle

Previous and next or Horse's mouth home

Forward to It's just not cricket

Domain Registry of America
Telephone systems
Learning to program in
It's just not cricket
pushd and popd
vi - full circle
On Customer Service
Comparators in Linux and Unix
Red Luas - early life and times
John Toner