Training, Open Source computer languages

PerlPHPPythonMySQLhttpd / TomcatTclRubyJavaC and C++LinuxCSS

Search our site for:
Home Accessibility Courses Diary The Mouth Forum Resources Site Map About Us Contact
Responding to spam
I understand that I shocked someone the other week by purchasing a service that I had seen advertised in a spam email that was going the rounds. I feel justified ... I didn't purchase off the spammer, but rather the spam reminded me of a service that was available and I took the reminder to research the options and buy elsewhere. Even if the spammer's offer had been competitive, I don't think for a moment I would have wanted to encourage him, so I would have been prepared to spend a little more to go to a company who's marketing I was comfortable with. Good news - in this case, our new "lo call" alternative phone numbers cost us a fraction of what the spam ad site offered.

I understand that 1 in 10 people has responded to Spam at one time or another. I'm not sure where that statistic came from, but I heard it quoted yesterday on the BBC's technology update show; I suspect it's not far from the mark. And it's why spammers keep on doing it.

Many years ago, before spam was common place, I did an experiment; I sent out 33 unsolicited emails, to carefully targeted recipients who's email addresses I had found on line, telling them about our services. In those days, bulk unsolicited email was frowned upon but not illegal in any way, and I wanted to get a feel for how people would react. I got 2 or 3 "snottygrams" - people who didn't appreciate being contacted in this way and let me know it. And I got 4 or 5 good contacts ... and that 15% positive response rate is truely astonishing for a marketing campaign. I'm NOT advocating that you spam these days; I have never done it again (and I would not), but I present it to you as a piece of evidence that helps show why it's done.
(written 2005-03-27 06:55:55)

 
Associated topics are indexed under
A213 - Web Application Deployment - Commercial and Legal Aspects
G902 - Well House Consultants - Web site techniques, utility and visibility

Back to
Easter at Well House Consultants
Previous and next
or
Horse's mouth home
Forward to
Embperl

Some other Articles
Harmony
A little bit of fun - the new Perl Quiz
Putting a form online
Embperl
Responding to spam
Easter at Well House Consultants
Politics gets nasty. Must be an election coming up.
Spring is in the air
STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR and DATA - Perl file handles
x operator in Perl
1689 posts, page by page
Link to page ... 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 at 50 posts per page


This is a page archived from The Horse's Mouth at http://www.wellho.net/horse/ - the diary and writings of Graham Ellis. Every attempt was made to provide current information at the time the page was written, but things do move forward in our business - new software releases, price changes, new techniques. Please check back via our main site for current courses, prices, versions, etc - any mention of a price in "The Horse's Mouth" cannot be taken as an offer to supply at that price.

Link to Ezine home page (for reading).
Link to Blogging home page (to add comments).

© WELL HOUSE CONSULTANTS LTD., 2008: Well House Manor • 48 Spa Road • Melksham, Wiltshire • United Kingdom • SN12 7NY
PH: 01144 1225 708225 • FAX: 01144 1225 707126 • EMAIL: info@wellho.net • WEB: http://www.wellho.net • SKYPE: wellho