| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Responding to spam
I understand that I shocked someone the other week by purchasing a service that I had seen advertised in a spam email that was going the rounds. I feel justified ... I didn't purchase off the spammer, but rather the spam reminded me of a service that was available and I took the reminder to research the options and buy elsewhere. Even if the spammer's offer had been competitive, I don't think for a moment I would have wanted to encourage him, so I would have been prepared to spend a little more to go to a company who's marketing I was comfortable with. Good news - in this case, our new "lo call" alternative phone numbers cost us a fraction of what the spam ad site offered.
I understand that 1 in 10 people has responded to Spam at one time or another. I'm not sure where that statistic came from, but I heard it quoted yesterday on the BBC's technology update show; I suspect it's not far from the mark. And it's why spammers keep on doing it. Many years ago, before spam was common place, I did an experiment; I sent out 33 unsolicited emails, to carefully targeted recipients who's email addresses I had found on line, telling them about our services. In those days, bulk unsolicited email was frowned upon but not illegal in any way, and I wanted to get a feel for how people would react. I got 2 or 3 "snottygrams" - people who didn't appreciate being contacted in this way and let me know it. And I got 4 or 5 good contacts ... and that 15% positive response rate is truely astonishing for a marketing campaign. I'm NOT advocating that you spam these days; I have never done it again (and I would not), but I present it to you as a piece of evidence that helps show why it's done. (written 2005-03-27 06:55:55) Associated topics are indexed under A213 - Web Application Deployment - Commercial and Legal AspectsG902 - Well House Consultants - Web site techniques, utility and visibility
Some other Articles
HarmonyA little bit of fun - the new Perl Quiz Putting a form online Embperl Responding to spam Easter at Well House Consultants Politics gets nasty. Must be an election coming up. Spring is in the air STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR and DATA - Perl file handles x operator in Perl 1689 posts, page by page
Link to page ... 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 at 50 posts per pageThis is a page archived from The Horse's Mouth at http://www.wellho.net/horse/ - the diary and writings of Graham Ellis. Every attempt was made to provide current information at the time the page was written, but things do move forward in our business - new software releases, price changes, new techniques. Please check back via our main site for current courses, prices, versions, etc - any mention of a price in "The Horse's Mouth" cannot be taken as an offer to supply at that price. Link to Ezine home page (for reading). Link to Blogging home page (to add comments). |
| ||||||||||
PH: 01144 1225 708225 • FAX: 01144 1225 707126 • EMAIL: info@wellho.net • WEB: http://www.wellho.net • SKYPE: wellho | |||||||||||