I am posting this, initially, as a purely personal analysis rather than official statement or policy of any sort. A Station Planning group has been set up with a strong elected chair, and this is informational to that group. And we have a meeting with the various departments of Wiltshire Council a week on Friday at which these issues will be raised and discussed and there's no conclusion - just information - until after that
Until 7th December 2013, Melksham has 2 trains each way per day - to Southampton at 06:38 and 19:11, and to Cheltenham Spa at 07:20 and 19:47. The times are inconvenient for most potential users, especially when you consider that most users are looking for (a) return trip opportunities or (b) longer distance journeys which start sometime between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. The consequence of this level and timing of service is that it doesn't meet potential passenger needs, as a table comparing Melksham to other Wiltshire Stations shows:
Those are 2010 figures... the office of rail regulation ticket sales figures show a growth year on year - here's how their figures rise year by year (with year to March 2012 being the final data column):
The local sustainable Transport Fund, bid for in 2012 and fully awarded ([application]
) provides for an increase from 2 to 8 trains each way per day between Swindon and Westbury, serving Chippenham, Melksham and Trowbridge along the way. That's more than just a 4 times increase in trains - it's a hundred times increase in practical journey opportunities ([read why]
). Here's an update of the diagram from that post, showing as and example current day trip opportunities to Swindon in red (can you spot it?) and additional ones in black:
Evidence - in multiple directions - points to a rise to around 800 journeys per day (from 20) at Melksham after a ramp-up period. That's 33 trips per 1000 population, still considerably below Warminster which (at 45) is the next most used urban station per head of population. How will those people get to and from the station? Here's results from across the county for 2010 at other stations:
And what would it be for Melksham? Clearly it's very dependent on what options are available. Melksham has some housing close to the station, much of which has limited parking available, and also a swathe of newer housing some of which is just being occupied about 1.5 miles or just more away. With this in mind, I asked a forum of regular train users across the South West this question: "You are a commuter with a 25 minute train journey home to your town from the city where you work, and you live just over a mile and a half from the station. When you get back to your home station, how would you consider getting home? Please check as many boxes as you wish of options that you would realistically make use of at least once a week on a daily commute." That's again taking the Melksham to Swindon flow as my example. Full discussion [here]
. Tabulated result:
The current population of Melksham has become used over the past generation to a fourth grade railway provision, whereas it's been second class at least in other rail-served towns. Some people will have an instant desire to switch from private car journeys all the way, from driving to other railheads, and bus on and from the first weekday of a new service, and there should be adequate provision for them. We need to bring provision up to second or third class in order to avoid a bubble of enthusiasm bursting for many in the disappointment of insufficient provision between the trains and their homes, businesses and the places they are visiting.
What metrics might we expect to see at the station, using the evidence above, should we have things properly in place
• Cars parked at station for the day: 70
• People dropped off at station: 60
• People picked up at station: 70
• People walking to station: 150
• People walking from station: 150
• Bus journeys to station: 50
• Bus journeys from station: 55
• Cycle journeys to station: 30
• Cycle journeys from station: 30
• Taxi to station: 30
• Taxi from station: 35
And remember that those figures are based on usage at just a half of the level of Wiltshire's least other used town station from 3 years ago. Allowance should really be made for parking for 300 pedestrians, 150 cars, and for 80 people arriving at the station on a connecting bus service.
What was included in the LSTF bid which was granted in full well over a year ago?
And this was a really positive sign of joined up thinking. Alas, what's currently showing on the Connecting Wilthsire website is different:
Now - there is an awful lot of good in what Wilshire Council and First are doing and have already done. The improvement in train services to Melksham will be fantastic. The consideration of health and safety at and on the way to the station, as witnessed by their early provision of extra road markings, has also to be a question looked at first and foremost. There is a good footpath with a raised curb along most of Station Approach, so any additional lining work will be in the immediate vicinity of the station. What is of concern is the disappearance of most of the measures on which the money was awarded, to the extent that improvements are likely to be seen as a movement up only from fourth rate to third class, with other stations in Wiltshire already being second class. And most of us will use a second (standard) class service, but we have to question what loss of potential use we'll see if it's third class.
OK - there you have the metrics of what we can anticipate in terms of traffic, a listing of the measures promised in the LSTF bid, and a list of what is planned for the opening and in the second phase. I understand a third phase is planned, but this service needs to take off from the start and at the latest adequate (second class) provision needs to be made by back-to-work day in the New Year. We can sell "teething troubles" and "learning curve" in the run up to Christmas!
Let's look at individual elements:
Pedestrian and Cycle Access to the station
From the Town Centre and from the A365, these are already adequate for the increase traffic. Improved road markings at the station are to be applauded, and it will be nice to have the underpass smartened up. I don't see a need to increase capacity there or alongside the A365 for pedestrians, as there are already the capacity that was put in for floods of school children when the secondary school was at George Ward.
From Foundry Close, a multistory town house development with limited parking, it's 50 metres to the station if you can climb a 2 metre fence, or 700 metres including two crossings of a trunk road, or a walk along the A350 without footpath, if you can't. Wiltshire Council owns the land on the station side up to the fence - it's a trackway that can take vehicles followed by about 8 yards of rough ground. On the Foundry Close side, a spur off the roundabout leads right up to the fence. At the least, a fence panel should be be removed to allow pedestrians and cyclists through. This will also save round-trip walking of around 1 km for the northern section of Melksham to the station.
We note that gas tanks have appeared just to the side of where a pedestrian path / cycle way would go, and are seeking information and assurances that these do not prevent foot, cycle and bus traffic from using this access which was planned in the LSTF bid.
In 2009, Wiltshire Council purchased land from BRB Residuary for future station use, and promised that any future lets would be short term. AJ King moved out quite soon thereafter, leaving an area where hundreds of cars could be parked right opposite the station. This area has been relet to a heavy plant hire company, and we were re-assured that any relet would be short term only so that the land could be used for the purpose for which the council bought it when the time was right.
That time is now; however, there is some doubt as to how "short term" the let of the land is. I have correspondence telling me that we can only expect a handful of extra parking spaces in time for the improved service, which at best would mean Station Approach lined with cars if the intended area isn't available.
An extra driver shift on the town bus - running a service to connect with outgoing commuter trains in the morning, and to connect from incoming commuter trains in the evening, was included in the LSTF works. However, I have now been told that consideration is being given to provision of a "demand responsive" alternative; under usual ways of working, such systems need to be booked ahead of time and I question whether people would use this for the town - in other words, are we setting ourselves up to fail? The survey figures above indicate that very many fewer people would use demand responsive than a bus service that can be taken without booking.
Town bus should serve station / trains.
X72 / 272 - stop at Roundponds is too far away. Timings on Faresaver (X72) connect with trains quite often during the day and indeed we have suggested to Faresaver that they send certain journeys via the forecourt. But there are some very unfortunate failures to connect, and some timings are going to mean people left stranded if bus or train is a few minutes late.
234 / x34 should run through station yard when Foundry Close cut through is opened.
Stop at top of station approach for 272 / X72 / Zigzag would be welcome as being better than Roundponds, but still pretty poor. Up to date but information on that stop for all services calling there (might sound obvious, but rare in Melksham!) should be provided, and of all the stops in Melksham this is probably the one that should have a live departure screen.
Provision of correct buses, with no extra vehicles at all, will results in a substantial bus ridership increase. Failure to provide will result in not only loss of bus traffic, but also loss of train traffic to and from Melksham.
The current at-station information comprises 3 panels of display located so that they are hard to rad in the dark, and containing the Cardiff to Portsmouth timetable sheet which shows Melksham trains, but not connections to Bath, Bristol or London. For arrivals in Melksham, there are two further panels at the top of Station Approach (100 metres from the station), which contain directions to the town, and where the bus stops are.
I have spoken with Nick Reid, Area Station Manager with First, and with the Melksham Railway Deelopment Group, and agreed that the best improvement on notice boards would be to add a 3 panel, double sided board along the line of the station fence under the lights. Extra panel / information to provide additional timetable sheets, rail offer marketing, and town and community rail information. We need to say "Welcome to Melksham" and have information (updatable by the CRP / MRDG?) on such things as taxi numbers.
The screen which provides train departure updates, installed by First a couple of years back, is pretty close to perfect - it would be even better if it hadn't broken down so often, and if delays were notified rather more logically. It includes an emergency button, and a travel enquiry button which are very useful indeed.
Finally, it would be wonderful to have a member of the CRP team based at the station on morning shift while trains are new. The building in the crane yard is the obvious choice (in the car park / near the station / good place to work from)
Train ticket sales in Melksham
As it stands, you can get on the train and (usually) buy your ticket from the conductor. We question whether the conductor will have time to issue all the tickets with enhanced numbers using the train, and at times the conductor doesn't have a ticket machine. People cannot collect tickets purchased in advance (sometimes much cheaper than buy-on-day tickets) from the conductor, and people have read so many warnings that they can be fined for getting on a train without a ticket that they don't like buying from the conductor, Melksham being an exception.
Options (not necessarily mutually exclusive, not necessarily practical either):
a) Carry on "as is"
b) Install a ticket machine at Melksham Station
c) Open a staffed ticket desk at Melksham Station
d) Sell train tickets at the TIC in Melksham (or at the Station)
Option (b) will allow collection of advanced tickets, but is slightly limited on the sale of other tickets and on information provided. Also very expensive and potential high running costs. Probably would not take cash. Note than another local TVM (Ticket Vending Machine) has been withdrawn due to vandalism.
Option (c) is almost certainly not something the Train Operator would do
Option (d) is seriously possible, except that we understand that commission rates are down 9% to 5% to (now) 3%. Whether at the TIC, and / or from a Community Rail Partnership base in the building in the crane yard / car park is also discussable.
I would need to research further about things like how photo cards for seasons are issued too. The only way to get ALL the ticket issuing options is probably (b) AND (c) or (d) and we would need very good figures for those to be supported ing term. First have a team of roving ticket issues equipped with portable "Avantix" machines - just possible one could be seconded from Chippenham for a start up period?
Open the Foundry Close cutthrough, and you have shops and McDonald's close to the station. A station office (Crane yard) could sell hot drinks as well as train tickets and provide information. The CRP would be interested in fronting this.
There may be a need to increase cycle parking. There is space for a few at the station on the covered platform unit, there are 3 secure boxes, and further provision would be possible in the crane yard.
Cycleway - open through Foundry Close, leading to Scotland Road and across the river via existing foot / cycle ways and you have a good route to the National network and to Melksham Forest.
Drop off and pick up; Taxi
Probably need to keep an eye on numbers here, but it may be adequate, a few spaces for 20 minute waits in the Crane Yard? And we should suggest to the local taxi firms that they might like to meet the trains ;-). (written 2013-10-26, updated 2013-10-28)
Associated topics are indexed as below, or enter http://melksh.am/nnnn for individual articlesZ950 - Purely Personal 
Looking forward to the autumn. - (2017-08-19) 
Sale of effects and furniture - 12th and 13th August 2017 - (2017-07-25) 
Learning how to be a more effective community partner - (2017-07-15) 
A year of changes for Lisa and Graham Ellis, and Well House - (2017-05-27) 
Revisiting - should I stand for Melksham Without Parish Council in May? - (2017-02-24) 
Thoughts on the new Blackmore Ward of Melksham Without Parish - (2017-02-22) 
Visiting Los Alamitos Bay Yacht Club - (2016-11-23) 
The technical article feed continues - personal updates more proactive on Facebook now! - (2016-10-30) 
Lisa writes - on the referendum vote today - (2016-06-23) 
Buses - how did we get into the situation we are in? - (2016-04-02) 
The end of competition on a bus route - the effects from then end of the 234 - (2016-03-02) 
Rumours of bus changes by First in Wiltshire - what we know and suspect - (2016-03-01) 
Where does Wiltshire bus subsidy money come from? - (2016-01-19) 
A big change in August - (2015-12-25) 
Election results - what if we had a party list system? - (2015-05-08) 
Misusing statistics? - the seedy side of election campaigning - (2015-05-04) 
Upcoming election - Chippenham Constituency - the major candidates compared - (2015-04-29) 
What can you and I learn from online quizzes? - (2014-09-27) 
Reaction in Radstock to new First bus prices - (2014-07-12) 
A different vision for the future - (2014-07-09) 
Eurpoean Elections, and other elections ahead. Some thoughts on campaigns and policies - (2014-05-08) 
Sharing my personal best of 2013 - (2013-12-31) 
Celebration of the fruits of LSTF, and of the people who have helped and are helping - (2013-12-15) 
Not treading water, but not risking the ship for a 0.5th of tar either - (2013-10-06) 
Improving travel advise information in Wiltshire - (2013-09-06) 
Wedding Photos - Kim Ellis to Kyle Londors, 22nd August 2013 - (2013-08-23) 
Zigzag bus - forward for the future, or decaying service? - (2013-06-09) 
How should we choose our Wiltshire Police and Crime Commissioner? - (2012-10-27) 
Kiss - (2012-04-28) 
Emerging proposals for land to the east of Spa Road, Melksham - (2012-02-03) 
Initial thoughts - response to GW Rail Franchise Consultation for Wiltshire - (2011-12-31) 
Aeryn at 1 - (2011-12-19) 
Melksham has a heart - have your picture taken and support the defibrillator appeal - (2011-11-06) 
A threat in the post? Poor marketing practise from Smiletrain? - (2011-09-19) 
If its Sunday, must it be Weymouth? - (2011-08-30) 
Quiet Monday in - (2011-05-23) 
The juggler - (2011-05-08) 
Melksham Town Council - vacancy in the Spa Ward - (2011-04-10) 
Melksham Campus - a win / win opportunity, but a severely lacking decision process - (2011-03-31) 
My First Christmas - (2010-12-26) 
Zyliana Kyrei Cox - (2010-11-16) 
Looking back and forward personally - 6 years each way - (2010-11-08) 
Birth Notice - Aeryn Cassandra Ellis - (2010-11-07) 
Travel, Transport and Tourism - A vision for Melksham, 2026 - (2010-10-03) 
Congratulations, Kimberly - (2010-07-25) 
Ruth Davis, 1916 - 2010 - (2010-03-28) 
The great thing about snow .... - (2009-12-23) 
A two day gap - first time in five years? - (2009-05-24) 
Too busy to blog it - but it's great (mostly) - (2007-01-24) 
Christmas Season Piccies - (2006-12-30)
Some other Articles
Regular Expression Substitution - TclWith the Shpigs and DonkeysA weekend away - Four in a Bed returns to Happy Donkey HillExcellent Railfuture conference, but some setup lessonsLooking to the future at Melksham StationEndorsed Perl, Python and PHP training - Tcl, Lua, Ruby and C too!Draft Westbury - Melksham - Swindon train times, from December 2014New trains for 2014 - Swindon to Westbury. Meetings Melksham, Swindon, Trowbridge, Chippenham and WestburyPython and Tcl courses, November, UK (Melksham) ... just a few places leftOfficial - Trowbridge and Melksham to London train improvements