Campaign for an appropriate TransWilts train service
Just two trains a day currently link the five major population centres of Wiltshire

Search for:
Home Accessibility FGW site Hotel The Mouth Forum Resources Training About Us Contact
Background to the TransWilts Train Fiasco

Management Summary - TransWilts Train service, linking largest Wiltshire population centres, growing rapidly but cut back to just 2 trains a day.

This is Article 1 of a series of 3.
Article 1 - Background to the TransWilts Train Fiasco
Article 2 - How much does a train service actually cost?
Article 3 - Why hasn't the fiasco been put right?

Grape and Melon Have you ever tried to find out how much it costs to run a train service? In spite of the fact that the main purpose of railways these days is to provide a passenger travel service for you and me (the taxpayer), it's remarkably hard for you and me (the taxpayer) to find out what it actually costs. And just when you think you're starting to get somewhere / understand it, something changes of some other spanner gets throws in the works.

Let's take the case of the TransWilts line, linking Swindon to the four largest urban areas in Wiltshire - Salisbury, Trowbridge, Melksham and Chippenham. Growing at between 10% and 35% per annum, compound, from 2001 to 2006 it was never the less cut back to just 2 trips per day from 2007, with those trips running in what has been described as "marginal time" - in other words, at a time of day when the trains are spare from other lines. Yes, you can read that as "severely offpeak and totally inappropriate as far as passengers are concerned" if you like!

Since Summer 2005, Save The Train, The Melksham Railway Development Group, The West Wilts Rail User's Group, The First Great Western Coffeeshop, More Train, Less Strain, Travel Watch South West, Canber ... as well as many other more broadly focused organisations ... have been campaigning for the return of an appropriate service. And, yes, the first stages of this campaign were to spread awareness of the issue, and to define appropriate.

A quarter past six in the morning, and a quarter to seven at night, and nothing else, isn't an appropriate service. Everyone agrees with that; you will find some who say "may as well not run the trains at all" and - short term - that would might save First Great Western a little money in reduced crew hours and on payments to Network Rail for track access. But it would be largely a paper saving; the trains, crews, and track would still be there are would still be maintained and - in my view - keeping the current service as a base is sensible.

Who do we ask "what is appropriate"? We could try asking the man in the street. And he'll come up with anything from "no trains" to "every 15 minutes" depending on his personal view and narrow experience, largely influenced by marketing campaigns by all and sundry. Asking questions such as "what would cause you to use the train, and how much" is much more fruitful in terms of getting a real answer, though even there, statisticians will tell you that there's a need to debias the data given.

Better to ask the experts - but who are they? You have the Local Transport Authority (Wiltshire County Council), the Train Operating Company (First Great Western) and the Department for Transport as the overseeing / controlling authorities. And you have other major players such as Government Office South West and Network Rail who - although they are not controlling - have major inputs and (in the case of Network Rail at least) could effectively shunt any scheme into a siding if they were so minded.

The experts - the LTA, FGW and the DfT - come up with an "appropriate service" definition of a train every hour or two. Yes, I have written that somewhat vaguely as there's a spread of service levels involved - very largely depending on how far you look ahead, with all the major towns on the line growing very fast in the next 20 years. And by "very fast", I mean over 50%. Melksham to rise from 23,000 to over 30,000. Chippenham to become the current size of the City of Salisbury ...

But stepping up from a service run with zero trains (the train that's used for the marginal service is borrowed off the Stroud Valley line, serving the Labour constituencies in Swindon, Stroud and Gloucester, when they have through London services instead at those times!) to one that runs every hour and requires three trains to do that would be a huge leap, and would provide capacity early. Far better to add a single train 'set' to the current inappropriate service, at a third of the cost but - if carefully timed - gaining far more that one third of the potential income.

I started my article with a picture of a grape and a melon, and that provides a good comparison between the two options that we're looking at. The "grape" is much smaller that the melon, but much richer in goodness, gram for gram or pound for pound ... and this article is being written as a follow up to a campaigner on a related transport issue who asked me why on earth figures between 100k per annum and 800k per annum were all being quoted to him. (And if HE is confused about the pricing, pity the "Man on the Train"!).

Move forward to part 2 to see my "grape" and "melon" train pricing comparison

Article 1 - Background to the TransWilts Train Fiasco
Article 2 - How much does a train service actually cost?
Article 3 - Why hasn't the fiasco been put right?
(written 2008-12-29 09:28:31)

 
Associated topics are indexed under
Z501 - Public Transport - Rail
  [2678] Reaching out to the community - a good case for support - (2010-03-15)
  [2662] Is Melksham public transport actually used? - (2010-03-05)
  [2658] Save the Train - a significant change in approach - (2010-03-03)
  [2634] London to and from Melksham by public transport - (2010-02-13)
  [2627] Saturdays out from Melksham - to Oxford, to Didcot or to Swindon - (2010-02-07)
  [2568] Forums for your Melksham and open source discussions - (2010-01-09)
  [2557] Rail Campaign - response to core consultation - (2009-12-31)
  [2556] Railway Station Survey - please complete today or tomorrow - (2009-12-30)
  [2533] Five guests, three groups, one car - (2009-12-11)
  [2529] Santa Special, 2009 - (2009-12-06)
  [2522] Integrated public Transport - what could be done for Melksham - (2009-12-01)
  [2513] Wiltshire Council purchases Melksham Station Land - (2009-11-26)
  [2511] The story of the railway land at Melksham Station - (2009-11-24)
  [2486] Santa Special - Trowbridge and Melksham to Swindon - (2009-10-31)
  [2477] By train ... - (2009-10-25)
  [2473] Exploring Old Railways - (2009-10-24)
  [2457] Railway Arithmetic - (2009-10-16)
  [2438] Listening to The Minister - (2009-10-05)
  [2395] From Lymington by train - last of the slammers - (2009-09-05)
  [2391] Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy - Draft for Consultation - (2009-09-02)
  [2372] Public Transport from (and to) Melksham on Sundays - (2009-08-23)
  [2328] Melksham - no trains, no southbound buses through the town - (2009-08-08)
  [2318] For Lua Programmers AND for Town Planners - (2009-08-02)
  [2268] Westbury Bypass Refused - looking forward - (2009-07-04)
  [2133] Bigger and better this year! - (2009-04-20)
  [2057] Train and Coach fares from London (and airports) to Melksham - (2009-02-26)
  [2042] Wiltshire Rail Service Update - (2009-02-15)
  [2026] Melksham Climate Friendly Group - (2009-02-05)
  [2024] Carry on Training - in spite of the weather - (2009-02-03)
  [1999] How low can you sink? - (2009-01-17)
  [1965] How much does a train service actually cost - (2008-12-29)
  [1964] Why hasnt the fiasco been put right - (2008-12-29)
  [1905] A Gold Star for First Great Western Customer Service - (2008-11-24)
  [1858] Camera with night vision, youth with no vision - (2008-10-28)
  [1848] 30th November - Santa Trip from Melksham - (2008-10-19)
  [1757] Preserved railways - struggling to the future? - (2008-08-17)
  [1729] Back from the future - (2008-07-30)
  [1708] A Train Service Update for Melksham Party in the Park - (2008-07-13)
  [1616] Not daring to be an anorak - (2008-04-19)
  [1567] Melksham - Swindon. Train v Bus v Car - (2008-03-07)
  [1558] Getting somewhere with the train service - (2008-02-28)
  [1530] Railway Acronyms and Abbreviations - (2008-02-03)
  [1452] Santa on the train to Melksham - (2007-12-01)
  [1428] Travel Across Wiltshire - the game - (2007-11-11)
  [1424] Closer than you think - the next step - (2007-11-08)
  [1358] Look forward with a new broom - Wiltshire Train Service - (2007-09-19)
  [1314] Business travel by train in the USA - (2007-08-22)
  [1303] Heading Upstate New York - (2007-08-14)
  [1291] Day trip to Weymouth - (2007-08-05)
  [1274] Radio coverage for railway issues - (2007-07-23)
  [1273] Melksham or Weymouth? Meal or day out? - (2007-07-23)
  [1228] Some progress on the train campaign - (2007-06-10)
  [1139] Overcrowded trains around Bristol - (2007-04-08)
  [1097] Train and business balls all in the air! - (2007-03-02)
  [1093] Wiltshire Train - can YOU come on 5th March? - (2007-02-25)
  [1076] Save the Train - an update - (2007-02-12)
  [1069] Rail trouble forced me to buy hotel - (2007-02-07)
  [1063] Bradford-on-Avon - 150 years of passenger trains - (2007-02-03)
  [1045] Bang! Train campaign hits home - (2007-01-19)
  [1044] Call for appropriate train services - Swindon, Bristol, Bath, West Wilts, Severn Beach etc - (2007-01-18)
  [1033] Empty at Easleigh, Missing at Melksham, Overflowing at Oldfield - (2007-01-14)
  [976] Santa at the station - (2006-12-09)
  [974] The last commuter train through Melksham - (2006-12-09)
  [952] Coming from London to Melksham by train for a course - (2006-11-28)
  [814] Melksham Railway Calendar 2007 - (2006-07-25)
  [790] Shadow Transport Minister to visit Melksham - (2006-07-02)
  [697] For any North and West Wilts and Swindon Readers - (2006-04-23)
  [648] West Wilts Railway Users Group and trains to Lacock - (2006-03-16)
  [632] Moral dilemma - (2006-03-04)
  [527] Greater Western Franchise Awarded - (2005-12-13)
  [524] Santa comes to Melksham - (2005-12-11)
  [488] Looking for railway groups and users - Swindon, Salisbury, Southampton - (2005-11-06)
  [486] Rail services under threat - Swindon, Melksham ... and Newquay and Bicester too - (2005-11-05)
  [447] Tomorrow's meeting. - (2005-09-19)
  [434] Through public transport connection, Chippenham to Salisbury, to cease - (2005-09-02)
  [428] Swindon - Chippenham - Melksham - Trowbridge - Westbury train service - (2005-08-29)
  [154] Railway train service, Melksham station - (2004-12-17)


Back to
How much does a train service actually cost
Previous and next
or
Horse's mouth home
Forward to
LinkedIn - Thrice Asked, and joined.
Some other Articles
Plagarism - who is copying my pages?
Search Engines. Getting the right pages seen.
Review of 2008
LinkedIn - Thrice Asked, and joined.
Background to the TransWilts Train Fiasco
Best source to learn Java (or Perl or PHP or Python)
Index Card System for Game Characters in PHP
Making our things easier to find
2674 posts, page by page
Link to page ... 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 at 50 posts per page


This is a page archived from The Horse's Mouth at http://www.wellho.net/horse/ - the diary and writings of Graham Ellis. Every attempt was made to provide current information at the time the page was written, but things do move forward in our business - new software releases, price changes, new techniques. Please check back via our main site for current courses, prices, versions, etc - any mention of a price in "The Horse's Mouth" cannot be taken as an offer to supply at that price.

Link to Ezine home page (for reading).
Link to Blogging home page (to add comments).

You can Add a comment or ranking to this page

© WELL HOUSE CONSULTANTS LTD., 2010: Well House Manor • 48 Spa Road • Melksham, Wiltshire • United Kingdom • SN12 7NY
PH: 01144 1225 708225 • FAX: 01144 1225 344596 • EMAIL: info@wellho.net • WEB: http://www.wellho.net • SKYPE: wellho