Training, Open Source computer languages
PerlPHPPythonMySQLApache / TomcatTclRubyJavaC and C++LinuxCSS 
Search for:
Home Accessibility Courses Diary The Mouth Forum Resources Site Map About Us Contact
 
This week, we're updating our course layouts and descriptions. Presentation and materials always gently change over time, but just occasionally there's a need to make a step change to clear out some of the old and roll in the new. That's now happening - but over a long and complex site it's not instant and you'll see sections of the site changing up to and including 19th September.

See also [here] for status update
 
Advantages and disvantages of MySQL

Posted by amoomi (amoomi), 14 April 2004
Hello i am new here,
could someone past me a list of advantages and disadnavtahes of Mysql, and if anyones knows any sites which tells the differences between different types of databases.
plz e-mail me on amoomi@hotmail.com or reply here
thank you

Posted by admin (Graham Ellis), 15 April 2004
MySQL is characterised as a fast, robust database with a good feature set, but one which lacks all the extras of something like Oracle ... so if you're writing code that's designed to be portable it's a pretty good choice.  Admin / security are effective but the setup of these and othe features isn't over-complicated. All in all, a pretty good choice for many "middle of the road" requirements.

As part of a course, a year or two back I wrote:


MySQL is characterised as a free, fast, reliable open source relational database. It does lack some sophistication and facilities, but it has an active development team and, as it goes from release to release, more capabilities are added. At certain times there will be a trade-off between speed and capabilities, and the MySQL team intend to keep their database engine fast and reliable. By comparison:


PostgreSQL is another open source relational database management system. It conforms to the SQL standards much better than MySQL and runs on a wide variety of platforms, but the extra feature set slows and complicates its use.


Oracle is the leading commercial RDMS; it's highly flexible, runs on many platforms and has a full and sophisticated feature set. Because of its highly tunable nature, an Oracle database administrator needs to be well and heavily trained.


Microsoft SQL Server runs only on Windows platforms, which excludes its use in applications where there is a need to run on Linux or Unix, or potentially such a need in the future



As a quick reference to the differences in the SQL languages as used between different database engines, have a look at the Kline's book - there's a description at http://www.wellho.net/book/1-56592-744-3.html

P.S. I'm posting this answer rather than emailing you - the answer may be of interest to others who pass by here in the future, so let's share it  



This page is a thread posted to the opentalk forum at www.opentalk.org.uk and archived here for reference. To jump to the archive index please follow this link.

You can Add a comment or ranking to this page

© WELL HOUSE CONSULTANTS LTD., 2014: Well House Manor • 48 Spa Road • Melksham, Wiltshire • United Kingdom • SN12 7NY
PH: 01144 1225 708225 • FAX: 01144 1225 899360 • EMAIL: info@wellho.net • WEB: http://www.wellho.net • SKYPE: wellho